Massachusetts Jury Returns $42.6 Million Verdict Against J&J in Baby Powder Mesothelioma Case
Won by Thornton Law Firm.
A Massachusetts jury found Johnson & Johnson liable for Paul Lovell's mesothelioma, awarding $42.6 million in what is believed to be the largest mesothelioma verdict in the state's history.
What happened
Paul Lovell used Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder for roughly four decades. He did not know, and had no reason to suspect, that the talc in that powder contained asbestos fibers. By the time he was diagnosed with mesothelioma, a cancer caused almost exclusively by asbestos exposure, the damage was done.
Lovell and his wife Kathryn filed suit against Johnson & Johnson in Middlesex County Superior Court, Case No. 21-2086, alleging the company had negligently sold a talc product contaminated with asbestos and had breached its warranty to consumers about the product's safety. The case moved to trial in 2025, with the two-week proceeding centering on decades of internal company documents and scientific evidence about the composition of J&J's Baby Powder.
Leslie-Anne Taylor of Thornton Law Firm served as lead Massachusetts counsel for the Lovells, working alongside Aaron Chapman and Danny Kraft of Dallas-based Dean Omar Branham Shirley. The trial team presented evidence that J&J had long-standing knowledge of asbestos in its talc supply and failed to adequately warn consumers.
The jury sided with the Lovells on liability and awarded $42.6 million in damages. The breakdown reflected both the severity of Paul's illness and the impact on his wife: $15 million for his past pain and suffering, $9 million for future pain and suffering, approximately $2.6 million in medical expenses, and $16 million combined for Kathryn's past and future loss of consortium. The total is believed to be the largest mesothelioma verdict in Massachusetts history.
Johnson & Johnson announced plans to appeal the verdict immediately after it was returned, with a company spokesperson calling the result 'inconsistent with the evidence.' No reduction or remittitur had been entered as of publication.
Sources
This account is drawn from contemporaneous public reporting and the court record.